Focus Ratings is a Uk and Irish Horse Racing ratings service designed to aid you and help you narrow the field so that you can concentrate on the real contenders. Our completely computerised analysis system selects the top three rated horses from each race and sends out the ratings every day at 10:00 a.m.  Wonderful results and an excellent strike rate.  Use Focus Ratings to win more money and make more profits from British and Irish Horse Racing.  The only horse racing system you'll ever need.

Morning News

focus-ratings-mornoing newsGood morning...

All round, a pretty good day yesterday.

A 32.50% overall strike rate is pretty good for a ratings agency and...

For the non-handicap races we got an strike rate of 46.67% with a POI (to ISP) of 31.27% for those top rated horses.

Our new Investment Betting strategy gave us 3 winners from the 5 selections.

That equates to a strike rate of 60%.

7.985 points (to ISP) were returned to the 5 points staked; this equates to a POI (Profit on Investment) of 37.38%

For more detail, here are the results in the Traffic Light Results PDF format... Yesterday's Traffic Light Results

Anyway, let's get on and take a quick look at yesterday's results in more detail....

Yesterday's Results

Yesterday's Results, show a strike rate (for our top rated horse) of 32.5%.

Yesterday's Live Ratings, show a strike rate (for our top rated horse) of 31.71%.

Yesterday's - Link to Follow - results for All Races (including previously unrated races), show a strike rate (for our top rated horse) of 30.23% from all 43 Races (including previously unrated races.)

The Overall Profit Index. If you had blindly backed every top three rated horse in all of the races you would have had 85.64 units returned to 118 units staked. The Overall Profit Index was, thus, -27.42%

Top Rated Horse - There were 13 winners from the top rated horses from 40 Races. If you had blindly backed the top rated horse in all of the races you would have had 38.94 units returned to 40 units staked. The Top Rated Profit Index was, thus, -2.65%

2nd Rated Horse - There were 3 winners from the second rated horses from 38 Races. If you had blindly backed the 2nd rated horse in all of the races you would have had 9.87 units returned to 38 units staked. The 2nd Rated Profit Index was, thus, -74.03%

3rd Rated Horse - There were 7 winners from the third rated horses from 40 Races. If you had blindly backed the 3rd rated horse in all of the races you would have had 36.83 units returned to 40 units staked. The 3rd Rated Profit Index was, thus, -7.93%

Non Handicap Races - Top Rated Horse - There were 15 non-handicap races yesterday. From these races there were 7 Top Rated winners. Thus, the Strike Rate (for Top Rated Horses) was 46.67%

Top Rated Horse - If you had blindly backed the top rated horse in all of the races you would have had 19.69 units returned to 15 units staked. The Top Rated Non-Handicap Profit Index was, thus, 31.27%

Non Handicap Races - Top Three Rated Horses - There were 15 non-handicap races yesterday. From these races there were 13 Top Three Rated winners. Thus, the Strike Rate (for the Top Three Rated Horses) was 86.67%

Something to make you smile...

Smithsonian Institute

The story behind the letter below is that there is this nutball in Newport, Rhode Island named Scott Williams who digs things out of his backyard and sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling them with scientific names, insisting that they are actual archaeological finds. This guy really exists!

Anyway... here's an actual response from the Smithsonian Institute. Bear this in mind next time you think you are challenged in your duty to respond to a difficult situation in writing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Smithsonian Institute
207 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20078

Dear Mr. Williams:

Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post...Hominid skull."

We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago.

Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, believes to be "Malibu Barbie." It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings.

However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:

1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically fossilized bone.

2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-homonids.

3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.

This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that:

A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has chewed on.

B. Clams don't have teeth.

It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to the heavy load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior To 1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results.

Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino.

Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin.

However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institute, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it.

We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in a structural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus Rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench.

Yours in Science,
Harvey Rowe
Chief Curator-Antiquities

Today

Today's early test ratings show 41 rated races from six meetings.

Have a great day's racing!

As always...

My kindest regards

keith-eckstein1

Leave a Reply

Take the one week Free Trial...

Horse Racing Betting System ResultsAs part of our total transparency, we run one week Free Trials....

So that people can try out the service before they sign up.

We don't ask for credit card details or anything like that...

We just need to know your email address so that we can set you up for your 1 week FREE trial.

Read the Independent Reviews!

And you should see how good our System Builder is!

If you wish to be offered a one week free trial, please complete the simple form below.

Name :
Email address :
 

Or, Click Here to read more...